Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 27 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Peugeot 206. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 992 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.9 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |