Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Opel Corsa 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Opel Corsa. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 44 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.84 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1060 litres | |
Opel Corsa has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 300 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`545 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |