Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 55 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 106 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 18 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.83 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.54 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1016 litres | |
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 256 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`480 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |