Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2005 - 2007
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP55 HP
Torque: 125 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds18 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.0
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1000 km on highway
730 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.83 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.52 m1.54 m
Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 155 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litres1016 litres
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 256 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`480
Safety:
Quality:
high

below average
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16002000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Fox has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv