Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 2005 and Mitsubishi Colt 2008 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Colt 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt 2005 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt 2005 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Colt 2005 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 21 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2008 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt 2005 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt 2008 (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |