Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 75 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |