Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 63 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 55 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Toyota Yaris quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |