Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 67 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 91 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
400 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 160 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 923 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`520 kg | 1`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`200 kg | 980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 320 kg | 490 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Colt load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 53 procentiem less than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Honda Jazz is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |