Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 25 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 562 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 7 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |