Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |