Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Colt) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 83 NM more than Honda Jazz. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 208 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 996 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |