Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 208 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 996 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |