Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 19 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 7 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`440 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |