Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Peugeot 206 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Colt) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 206) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 27 HP more power than Peugeot 206, but torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 206. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.0 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt and Peugeot 206 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 992 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`476 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |