Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 5 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 208 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |