Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Honda Jazz. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 117 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |