Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 99 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 9 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Getz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Picanto, Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |