Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Opel Corsa 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 6 HP less power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Corsa. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 44 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.87 m | 3.84 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.44 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1060 litres | |
Opel Corsa has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 300 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`605 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |