Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 83 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 119 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 12 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 91 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.87 m | 3.84 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1323 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 160 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`470 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |