Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 256 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |