Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Citroen C3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 5 HP more power than Citroen C3, but torque is 8 NM less than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 150 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 390 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |