Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 23 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2004 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2004 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 175 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 980 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |