Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Colt) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Star) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 104 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | 912 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |