Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 55 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Toyota Yaris quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |