Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 24 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |