Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 7 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |