Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan Note has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Nissan Note, so Nissan Note quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Nissan Note has
| |