Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Nissan Note 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 3 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Nissan Note. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 325 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 1495 litres | |
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 105 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 463 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`510 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Nissan Note has
| |