Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai i20 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 17 HP more power than Hyundai i20, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Hyundai i20. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i20 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used also on Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Hyundai i20 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 1045 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 75 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i20 (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |