Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |