Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Audi A1 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Colt) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A1) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi A1, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Audi A1. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm shorter than the Audi A1, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A1 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi A1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Audi A1 has
| |