Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1032 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 364 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`450 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Net weight: | 965 kg | 1`047 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 373 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Colt load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Honda Jazz. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |