Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Renault Megane 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Renault Megane has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 105 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 151 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 5.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 48 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Renault Megane has
| |