Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2009
Volkswagen EOS
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen EOS has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 1.5 (petrol)1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)


Power: 109 - 150 HP122 - 210 HP
Torque: 145 - 210 NM200 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 - 10.5 seconds7.8 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 7.14.8 - 7.5
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 3.88 m4.42 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mitsubishi Colt is 54 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 190 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data380 litres
Mitsubishi Colt has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`978
Safety: no datano data
above average

above average
Average price (€): 30007400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • manual gearbox only
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen EOS has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: