Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen EOS has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 122 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 200 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 54 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |