Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Beetle has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 126 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 9.3 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 5.5 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Beetle. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Beetle, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 80 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |