Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Mitsubishi Colt 2007 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt 2004 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
Mitsubishi Colt 2007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt 2007 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 2007 is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
Mitsubishi Colt 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt 2007 has 310 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt 2004. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt 2007 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`497 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |