Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs BMW Z4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW Z4 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mitsubishi Colt is available with front wheel drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 150 - 343 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 200 - 365 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 5 - 8.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 7.5 - 12.2 | |
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.30 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 21 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 240 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 260 litres | |
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 50 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`604 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |