Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Audi TT 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Audi TT has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 160 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 210 NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | 5.4 - 7.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.1 | 5.5 - 10.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 31 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`721 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Audi TT has
| |