Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 69 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 125 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 10 - 19.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 5.8 - 8.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |