Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Peugeot 206 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Peugeot 206 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 120 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 9.4 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 992 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`471 kg | ~ 1`538 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 992 kg | ~ 1`017 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 479 kg | ~ 521 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |