Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Opel Astra 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 65 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 110 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 8.8 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.6 - 9.3 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Opel Astra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 23 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1180 litres | |
|
Opel Astra has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 1`661 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Opel Astra has
| |