Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Toyota Yaris 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota Yaris is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 90 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`471 kg | ~ 1`368 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 992 kg | ~ 964 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 479 kg | ~ 404 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Colt load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Toyota Yaris. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |