Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Toyota Yaris 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 90 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 26 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |