Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 1996 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt 2004, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 1996 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 760 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt 1996 has 260 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt 2004. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt 1996 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt 1996 (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt 1996 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt 2004, which means Mitsubishi Colt 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |