Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 154 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 10 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 5.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 42 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 179 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |