Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Mazda 2 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 2 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 121 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 10.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 787 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`471 kg | ~ 1`496 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 992 kg | ~ 985 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 479 kg | ~ 511 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |