Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Toyota Auris 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 90 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 130 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 8.1 - 14.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 5.0 - 7.1 | |
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1355 litres | |
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 134 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 595 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`777 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |