Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Opel Agila 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 65 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 90 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 12.3 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.5 - 5.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Agila. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Agila. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm longer than the Opel Agila, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 660 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 5 litres less trunk space than the Opel Agila. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Agila, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Opel Agila has
| |