Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 10 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |