Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 54 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 106 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.9 seconds | 9.5 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 616 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`463 | ~ 1`647 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |