Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 150 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 12.9 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Colt are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Yaris. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
400 litres | 1183 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 783 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`463 kg | ~ 1`477 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`155 kg | ~ 1`048 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 308 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Colt load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Toyota Yaris. Therefore, Toyota Yaris is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |