Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 65 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 145 NM | 90 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | 12 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 6.1 | 5.0 - 5.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Colt has 42 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`439 | ~ 1`493 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |